Start your free 3-day trial — no credit card required, full access included

Evidence - Carpal tunnel syndrome – open carpal roof division

  1. Summary of the Literature

    The most common entrapment syndrome of a peripheral nerve is carpal tunnel syndrome, first described by Paget in 1854 [6, 19]. The cause of damage to the median nerve is persistent compression in the carpal tunnel. This affects not only the median nerve but also the flexor digitorum superficialis, profundus, and flexor pollicis longus muscles.

    Incidence and Prevalence

    The incidence of CTS is approximately 3 cases per 1000 inhabitants [19]. In a southern Swedish cohort, the prevalence of clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed CTS was about 2.7% [6]. Women are three to four times more frequently affected, and the risk is increased in occupations with frequent wrist strain (e.g., cleaners, gardeners, locksmiths, etc.). The prevalence is highest between the ages of 40 and 60. However, younger adults and children, such as during pregnancy (often in the third trimester) or in childhood with metabolic disorders like mucopolysaccharidosis, can also be affected. CTS often occurs bilaterally, with the dominant hand more frequently affected.

    Causes

    Distal radius fractures, local space-occupying lesions (e.g., ganglia), rheumatic diseases, and metabolic disorders can rarely lead to CTS. Associations exist between CTS and dialysis-dependent renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, and an increased body mass index (BMI) [11, 14]. Another important risk factor is pregnancy. Up to 40% of pregnant women show electrophysiological signs of CTS in the third trimester [29]. Long-term pressure increases in the carpal tunnel, caused among other things by edematous swelling of the synovium, are crucial for the pathogenesis of CTS [10]. This results in ischemia in the epi- and perineurium of the median nerve with edema formation and focal demyelination, mainly affecting the large myelinated fibers [17]. Over time, axonal degeneration may occur.

    Diagnostics

    History and clinical examination are crucial for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome. Electrophysiological examination can confirm the clinical diagnosis and demonstrate the reduced nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve. The distal motor latency of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel is determined. A value of > 4.2 ms is pathological (distance between stimulus and recording electrode 6.5 cm) [1]. Pathological measurements without corresponding clinical symptoms are not an indication for surgery but should be monitored over time [5, 13]. Conversely, decompression may benefit patients with typical history and clinical findings of carpal tunnel syndrome even with normal nerve conduction velocity [9, 16].

    Conservative Treatment

    Conservative treatment is recommended if symptoms are mild. Symptoms can potentially be reduced by the following measures [2, 3, 4, 5, 15]:

    • Occupational therapy: manual techniques, thermal applications, and sensory training.
    • Wrist splint at night for symptom relief
    • oral corticosteroid preparation
    • perineural infiltration of a corticosteroid crystal suspension under neurosonographic control

    If conservative treatment is unsuccessful and there are sensory or motor disturbances, surgical treatment is indicated [19].

    Surgical Treatment

    Indications

    Painful paresthesias and persistent sensory or motor deficits, such as loss of thumb abduction and opposition strength, are indications for surgery [5]. Electrophysiological evidence of reduced nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve confirms the clinical diagnosis and facilitates indication. Measurement of nerve conduction velocity is generally recommended before elective carpal tunnel surgery [5]. In acute carpal tunnel syndrome, e.g., due to a distal radius fracture, emergency decompression of the carpal tunnel is required without electrophysiological examination.

    A multi-day postoperative immobilization in a wrist splint in 20° dorsiflexion of the wrist is optional. Studies showed no advantage for immobilization [18].

    Approximately 300,000 procedures for carpal tunnel syndrome are performed annually in Germany. Decompression of the carpal tunnel can be performed through a standard approach, via one or two mini-incisions, or endoscopically [5, 8, 23, 30]. Mini-incisions increase the risk of incomplete retinaculum division and iatrogenic lesions of the median and ulnar nerves [5].

    Endoscopic decompression of the median nerve results in less postoperative scar pain due to smaller skin incisions compared to open carpal roof division. Overall, long-term outcomes are similar with both methods [26]. However, the operative risk with endoscopic procedures appears to be significantly higher [7].

    The open decompression remains the standard method, as the potential for faster load-bearing and reduced scar pain does not justify the operative risk for iatrogenic nerve lesions and the higher costs associated with endoscopic procedures [13, 26].

    Comparison of CTS Surgical Techniques

    TechniqueFeaturesRisks
    Open Surgery
    • Standard method
    • for all patients, including recurrences
    • shallow learning curve
    • Long-term results good to very good
    • low complication rate due to good visibility of the site
    Open Surgery with Mini-Incision
    • for experienced surgeons
    • for all patients
    • higher risk of incomplete retinaculum division
    • higher risk of nerve lesion
    Endoscopic Surgery, Monoportal (Agee Technique)
    • 1 cm skin incision above the wrist crease
    • single-hand technique
    • not for previous hand surgeries or recurrences
    • long learning curve
    • Short-/long-term results good to very good
    • cost-intensive (single-use handpiece)
    • higher risk of incomplete retinaculum division
    • higher risk of nerve lesion (learning phase)
    Endoscopic Surgery, Biportal (Chow Technique)
    • MIC technique with 2 skin incisions
    • long learning curve
    • Short-/long-term results good to very good
    • more cost-effective due to multiple use
    • higher risk of nerve lesion (learning phase)
    • injury to the palmar arterial arch

    Source: Gelderblom, M., Antoniadis, G. Diagnosis and Therapy of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. InFo Neurology 24, 32–43 (2022).

    Advantages of the Open Standard Surgery

    • Lower risk of incomplete retinaculum division.
    • Lower risk of iatrogenic lesions of the median and ulnar nerves.
    • Inspection of the surgical site without issues
    • Uncomplicated synovectomy of the flexor tendons (e.g., in rheumatic diseases), ganglion excision within the carpal tunnel, etc.
    • If necessary, visualization and decompression of the motor branch of the median nerve

    Disadvantages of the Open Standard Surgery

    • Scar pain in the access area due to lesions of skin nerve branches [22].
    • Postoperative reduction in hand strength in manual workers, possibly due to the loss of the flexor retinaculum, an important component of the pulley system of the finger flexor tendons, as well as a postoperative widening of the transverse bony carpal arch (carpal canal), which has been discussed in the literature [24].

    Complications

    • Injury to the palmar branch of the median nerve: microsurgical coaptation [21].
    • Injury to the motor branch of the median nerve: microsurgical coaptation. If reinnervation of the muscles innervated by the median nerve does not occur, a motor substitution operation may be necessary [28].
    • Postoperative persistent carpal tunnel syndrome due to incomplete division of the flexor retinaculum: revision with complete decompression [5].
    • Opening of the Guyon's canal with risk to the ulnar vascular/nerve bundle: strictly vertical dissection from the described skin incision into the depth towards the retinaculum.

    The CTS surgery has a low complication rate. Postoperative bleeding or wound infections are well below 1%. Nerve injuries are rare with experienced surgeons, but they can occur more frequently during the learning phase of endoscopic procedures. A survey of American surgeons (6,833 procedures) showed a complication rate of 0.8% for open technique and 1.6% for endoscopically operated patients [25]. In a literature review of 9,516 operations, Boeckstyns reported an irreversible nerve lesion rate of 0.3% for endoscopic and 0.2% for open surgeries [7].

    Postoperatively, pain in the palm, known as "pillar pain," may occur. This may be due to the gaping of the distal end of the flexor retinaculum after division. The symptoms can occur after both open and endoscopic surgeries and usually disappear after six months. A complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS I) is extremely rare when surgeries are performed properly [2].

    Results

    Haupt et al. studied 60 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome after retinaculum division with a mean follow-up time of 5.5 years (2 to 11 years). In 26% of cases, there was a complete resolution of symptoms and normalization of electrophysiological parameters. In 45% of cases, there was a significant improvement in pain, function, and electrophysiological parameters, while in 15% of cases, there was only a slight improvement, in 7% there was no improvement, and in 7% there was a clinical deterioration. Accordingly, in 86% of cases, clinical and electrophysiological findings improved postoperatively to varying degrees [12]. In a retrospective study, Mühlau et al. examined 157 individuals with electrophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome. A significant improvement was found in 86% of the 85 surgically treated patients. However, symptoms also significantly improved in 32% of non-operated patients [20].

    Comparison of Surgical and Conservative Treatments

    In a meta-analysis by Verdugo et al., four randomized controlled trials with a total of 317 patients were examined, comparing the outcomes of surgery and conservative therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome. After 3 and 6 months and after 1 year, the clinical outcomes and electrophysiological measurements showed advantages of surgical therapy compared to conservative measures [27].

  2. Currently ongoing studies on this topic

  3. Literature on this Topic

    1. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: summary statement. Muscle Nerve. 2002 Jun;25(6):918-22

    2. Antoniadis G, Bischoff C, Dumont C K et al. Diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. S3-Guideline of the German Societies for Hand Surgery, Neurosurgery, Neurology, Orthopedics, and Trauma Surgery. AWMF Guideline Register 2022;No. 005-003

    3. Antoniadis G, Bischoff C, Pöschl P, Schulte-Mattler W, Assmus. H. Carpal tunnel syndrome - Diagnosis and treatment. MMP 2020;43:420-30

    4. Assmus H, Antoniadis G. The compression syndromes of the median nerve. Assmus H and Antoniads G, Eds Nerve Compression Syndromes Heidelberg: Springer Verlag 2015:45-86

    5. Assmus H, Antoniadis G, Bischoff C, Haussmann P, Martini AK, Mascharka Z, Scheglmann K, Schwerdtfeger K, Selbmann HK, Towfigh H, Vogt T, Wessels KD, Wüstner-Hofmann M. [Diagnosis and therapy of carpal tunnel syndrome--guideline of the German Societies of Hand Surgery, Neurosurgery, Neurology, Orthopaedics, Clinical Neurophysiology and Functional Imaging, Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, and Surgery for Traumatology]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2007 Aug;39(4):276-88.

    6. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999 Jul 14;282(2):153-8.

    7. Boeckstyns ME, Sørensen AI. Does endoscopic carpal tunnel release have a higher rate of complications than open carpal tunnel release? An analysis of published series. J Hand Surg Br. 1999 Feb;24(1):9-15.

    8. Bromley GS. Minimal-incision open carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Am. 1994 Jan;19(1):119-20.

    9. De Kleermaeker FGCM, Meulstee J, Claes F, Kasius KM, Verhagen WIM. Treatment outcome in patients with clinically defined carpal tunnel syndrome but normal electrodiagnostic test results: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol. 2017 Dec;264(12):2394-2400.

    10. Donato G, Galasso O, Valentino P, Conforti F, Zuccalà V, Russo E, Maltese L, Perrotta I, Tripepi S, Amorosi A. Pathological findings in subsynovial connective tissue in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neuropathol. 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):129-35.

    11. Geoghegan JM, Clark DI, Bainbridge LC, Smith C, Hubbard R. Risk factors in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Aug;29(4):315-20.

    12. Haupt WF, Wintzer G, Schop A, Löttgen J, Pawlik G. Long-term results of carpal tunnel decompression. Assessment of 60 cases. J Hand Surg Br. 1993 Aug;18(4):471-4.

    13. Kart I, Sauerbier M, Eisenschenk A et al (2014) Hand Surgery. Elsevier, Munich

    14. Lampainen K, Shiri R, Auvinen J, Karppinen J, Ryhänen J, Hulkkonen S. Weight-Related and Personal Risk Factors of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 10;11(6).

    15. Lee EY, Lim AYT. Nerve Compression in the Upper Limb. Clin Plast Surg. 2019 Jul;46(3):285-293.

    16. Mackenzie SP, Stone OD, Jenkins PJ, Clement ND, Murray IR, Duckworth AD, McEachan JE. Carpal tunnel decompression in patients with normal nerve conduction studies. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Mar;45(3):260-264.

    17. Mackinnon SE. Pathophysiology of nerve compression. Hand Clin. 2002 May;18(2):231-41.

    18. Martins RS, Siqueira MG, Simplício H. Wrist immobilization after carpal tunnel release: a prospective study. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006 Sep;64(3A):596-9.

    19. Mondelli M, Giannini F, Giacchi M. Carpal tunnel syndrome incidence in a general population. Neurology. 2002 Jan 22;58(2):289-94.

    20. Mühlau G, Both R, Kunath H. Carpal tunnel syndrome--course and prognosis. J Neurol. 1984;231(2):83-6. PubMed [citation] PMID: 6737014

    21. Nigst H (1989) The operation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Oper Orthop Traumatol 1:17–24

    22. Reale F, Ginanneschi F, Sicurelli F, Mondelli M. Protocol of outcome evaluation for surgical release of carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurosurgery. 2003 Aug;53(2):343-50.

    23. Richter VM, Brüser P. [Surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison between long and short incision and endoscopic release]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1996 May;28(3):160-6.

    24. Rosenbaum RB, Ochoa JL (1993) Carpal tunnel syndrome and other disorders of the median nerve. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston

    25. Schenck R. The role of endoscopic surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Adv Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;11:17-43

    26. Scholten RJ, Gerritsen AA, Uitdehaag BM, van Geldere D, de Vet HC, Bouter LM. Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD003905.

    27. Verdugo RJ, Salinas RS, Castillo J, Cea JG. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD001552.

    28. Von Lanz T, Wachsmuth W (2003) Lanz/Wachsmuth Practical Anatomy. Arm: A textbook and reference book of the anatomical foundations of medical practice. Springer, Berlin

    29. Weimer LH. Neuromuscular disorders in pregnancy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;172:201-218.

    30. Wilson KM. Double incision open technique for carpal tunnel release: an alternative to endoscopic release. J Hand Surg Am. 1994 Nov;19(6):907-12.

  4. Reviews

    Bennett OM, Sears ED. The Impact of Reference Standard on Diagnostic Testing Characteristics for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jul 3;11(7):e5067

    Cage ES, Beyer JJ, Ebraheim NA. Injections for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A narrative review of the literature. J Orthop. 2023 Feb 21;37:81-85.

    Dabbagh A, MacDermid JC, Yong J, Packham TL, Grewal R, Boutsikari EC. Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Provocative Maneuvers for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2023 Jun 5;103(6).

    Ekhtiari S, Phillips M, Dhillon D, Shahabinezhad A, Bhandari M. Understanding the Learning Curve of Carpal Tunnel Release With Ultrasound Guidance: A Review. Cureus. 2023 Jul 15;15(7):e41938.

    Ence AK, DeGeorge BR Jr. Management of Failed Carpal and Cubital Tunnel Release:  An Evidence-Based Guide to Success. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Jun 9;5(4):510-518.

    Kumar N, Chandan SK, Jalan D, Sinha S, Jaiswal B, Singh DK. Ultrasound-guided interventions in primary carpal tunnel syndrome: perineural injection to thread carpal tunnel release. Br J Radiol. 2023 Sep 3:20230552.

    Kumaş A, Warenburg MV, Natroshvili T, Kemler M, Foumani M. The Influence of Corticosteroid Injections on Postoperative Outcomes of Carpal Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review. Arch Plast Surg. 2023 Aug 2;50(4):398-408.

    Lam KHS, Wu YT, Reeves KD, Galluccio F, Allam AE, Peng PWH. Ultrasound-Guided Interventions for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;13(6).

     Liawrungrueang W, Wongsiri S, Sarasombath P. Endoscopic carpal surgery in carpal  tunnel syndrome: A systematic review. SAGE Open Med. 2023 Jun 8;11:

    Lo YC, Lin CH, Huang SW, Chen YP, Kuo YJ. High incidence of trigger finger after carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2023 Aug 1;109(8)

    Mao B, Li Y, Yin Y, Zhang Z, Li J, Fu W. Local corticosteroid injection versus physical therapy for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Asian J Surg. 2023 May 4.

    Ozdag Y, Hu Y, Hayes DS, Manzar S, Akoon A, Klena JC, Grandizio LC. Sensitivity and Specificity of Examination Maneuvers for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2023 Jul 24;15(7)

    Zaheer SA, Ahmed Z. Neurodynamic Techniques in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate  Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 25;12(15)

  5. Guidelines

  6. literature search

    Literature search on the pages of pubmed.