Start your free 3-day trial — no credit card required, full access included

Evidence - Colostomy (sigmoidostomy) creation, double-barreled, laparoscopic

  1. Summary of the Literature

    Approximately 160,000 people in Germany live with an enterostomy [1], of which about 70% have a colostomy and 20% have an ileostomy [2]. The average age of those affected is in the 7th decade of life.

    Differentiated according to the intestinal segment used:

    • Ileostomy
    • Jejunostomy
    • Colostomy
      • Cecostomy
      • Transverse colostomy
      • Sigmoidostomy

    On webop.de you will find the following educational contributions on this topic:

    Ileostomy Placement

    Ileostomy Reversal

    Colostomy (Sigmoidostomy) Placement, Loop, Laparoscopic

    Rectal Resection according to Hartmann

    Ileostomy Reversal (without Resection) with Skin Closure in Gunsight Technique

     

    The creation of a stoma has a significant impact on quality of life. The success of treatment and the quality of life of the stoma patient depend on careful care and professional pre- and postoperative stoma therapy/care [10, 33, 51].

    An intestinal stoma may be indicated for various reasons, such as in neoplastic diseases, to protect risk anastomoses, or after radical oncological bowel resections (e.g., abdominoperineal rectal extirpation), sepsis after bowel perforations (e.g., sigmoid diverticulitis), bowel resections in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease), in congenital anomalies, and in emergency situations such as after abdominal trauma, ileus, ischemia, or perforation [4, 14].

    The tension-free creation of prominent and well-perfused stomas requires appropriate expertise of the surgeon, especially in obese abdominal walls and short, thickened mesentery. A functionally flawless stoma significantly contributes to improved patient quality of life and the avoidance of complications [49]. Preoperative stoma marking is an important measure to avoid stoma complications, ideally performed jointly by surgeons and stoma therapists [3, 14].

    Prominence

    Enterostomies should, whenever possible, be created prominently, i.e., the lumen should protrude above the skin level of the abdominal wall. The manageability of the stoma and the rate of complicated stomas depend on the prominence of the stoma [8, 35]. It is recommended that ileostomies and colostomies should protrude at least 2 cm above the skin level. Strong abdominal walls and a compact, shortened mesentery, as in obesity, Crohn's disease, and tumor diseases, are among the circumstances that make prominent creation difficult or even impossible.

    Bridles

    Bridles are used in loop stomas to prevent retraction of the loop. However, the data on the use of bridles is sparse. In a single randomized controlled trial, no difference was found between groups with and without bridles for early retraction in loop ileostomies [47]. Regarding the different materials of bridles, some observational studies have shown that flexible bridles, such as rubber reins, provide better postoperative care compared to rigid bridles [21, 25, 43]. 

    Prophylaxis of Parastomal Hernias

    Parastomal hernias can occur in up to 50% of all stomas within the first few years after stoma creation [24]. Hernia repair is problematic, as despite the use of meshes, recurrences occur in nearly 1 in 5 patients. Therefore, in recent years, prophylactic surgical procedures have increasingly been investigated to reduce the number of hernias. These include various mesh techniques, including extraperitoneal tunneling [13, 22]. Compared to conventional stoma creation without mesh repair, the retromuscular placement of lightweight polypropylene meshes showed a reduction in hernia rates without differences in morbidity, mortality, quality of life, or costs [7].

    Laparoscopic Stoma Creation

    In the last 20 years, the laparoscopic technique has increasingly been established as the access route for stoma creation. Prospective randomized data are not available, but numerous observational studies have shown advantages for the short-term postoperative course after laparoscopic creation with comparable morbidity [50]. In loop ileostomies, care must be taken during laparoscopic creation not to twist the loop and not to kink the mesentery in terminal ileostomies [30].

    Complications

    Complications are distinguished as early (occurring < 3 months after stoma creation) and late complications (> 3 months after creation) [24]. Early complications can occur for operative-technical reasons (e.g., unfavorable outlet site, stoma opening placed too far, insufficient mobilization, necrosis, mucosal bleeding, parastomal abscesses, stoma avulsion, leakage) [24, 37]. 20 to 70% of patients experience late structural complications, e.g., due to care-dependent factors such as leaving the stoma in place too long, lack of training, but also retraction and parastomal hernias [4, 49]. Stoma complications drastically reduce patients' subjective quality of life [38]. According to studies, ileostomies have the highest complication risk (about 75%), followed by end-descending colostomies (about 65%).

    The frequency of skin changes varies from 18 to 55% due to placement-related and patient-specific care problems. These changes can range from mild erythema to ulcerations and severe infections. They can usually be controlled by consistent conservative therapy, adjustment of care, and patient education.

    ComplicationFrequency [%]Procedure after Failure of Conservative MeasuresNote
    Retraction1-9Parastomal mobilization, if necessary, relaparoscopy/-tomy with remobilization30-40% of all parastomal complications
    Prolapse2-22Resection, if necessary, new placement on the opposite sideloop > end, loop colostomy > loop ileostomy (16-19% vs. 2%)
    Hernia14-40Mesh implantation, if necessary, new placement on the opposite sideunusual as an early complication (0-3%)
    Mucocutaneous Dehiscence and Abscess4-25Relief, drainageusually manageable by adjusting stoma care

    Necrosis

    • superficial
    • deep

     

    2-20

    0-3

    superficial: usually no surgical intervention required

    deep: relaparoscopy/-tomy with remobilization and resection

    early endoscopy via stoma

    Source: Gröne, J. Stoma. coloproctology 40, 145–160 (2018)

     

    Measures to Prevent and Optimize Stoma Complications

    • Preoperative stoma marking by stoma therapists and surgeons
    • Professional pre- and postoperative stoma therapy/care
    • Structured, specialized surgical and stoma-specific follow-up, close collaboration with general practitioners and stoma therapists
    • If necessary, reevaluation of stoma reversal or reconnection surgery
    • Stringent and timely treatment of complications, especially structural complications

     Management of Parastomal Hernias

    The suture repair of parastomal hernias has a recurrence rate of up to 70%. Especially for large parastomal hernias, mesh repair or repositioning should be considered. Despite the lack of randomized controlled studies, significantly lower recurrence rates of 7 to 17% have been found for the different mesh techniques "onlay," "sublay," retromuscular, "keyhole," and "Sugarbaker repair." The implantation of meshes in parastomal hernias has a low complication rate, and mesh infection ranges between 2 and 3%. It seems that laparoscopic repair is a safe option compared to the open procedure [20].

    High-output Ileostomy

    Early dehydration occurs in about 16–30% of all patients after ileostomy creation and is one of the most common causes of hospital readmission after ileostomy creation. Excessive secretion through the stoma calms down in many cases, yet up to 50% of patients require long-term medication [5].

    Medication Therapy for High-output Ileostomy

    GroupSubstanceDoseNote
    Opiates

    Loperamide

    Codeine

    Tinctura opii

    2-4 mg 3-4x daily

    15-60 mg 3-4x daily

    2-20 drops 3-4x daily

    no addiction risk

    addiction risk

    addiction risk

    Bile Acid BindersCholestyramine4 g 1-4x dailyfor chologenic diarrhea
    Secretion Inhibitors

    Omeprazole

    Octreotide

    40 mg 1-2x daily

    50-250 µg 3x daily s.c.

    short bowel

    Source: Gröne, J. Stoma. coloproctology 40, 145–160 (2018); Dosages without guarantee!

    In general, stoma output ranges between 0.2 and 0.7 liters per day. The definition of a high-output ileostomy is not uniform, which is why the secretion amount varies between 1000 and 2000 milliliters within 24 hours depending on the author. Clinical impairment and the development of renal failure due to the loss of water, sodium, and magnesium, as well as later malnutrition, are very likely at amounts over 2000 ml. A useful approach to reducing hospital readmission rates due to dehydration is the use of standardized treatment pathways:

    • Patient education,
    • ensuring self-care,
    • documentation and control of intake and output after hospital discharge,
    • nutritional counseling,
    • outpatient support and care by stoma therapists, and
    • early outpatient follow-up appointments.

    If therapy refractoriness is present, the possibility of early reversal of the loop ileostomy should be considered, which is safely possible upon evidence of primary anastomotic healing after rectal resection [9].

     Stoma Reversal

    To treat or remedy stoma complications, it is important to consider the possibility of reversal (loop ileostomy) or reanastomosis (end-descending/sigmoidostomy). The reversal of a protective ileostomy is generally simple but can also be difficult due to adhesions. More challenging is a reanastomosis after a Hartmann's operation, with relatively high mortality and morbidity. Normally, reanastomosis is performed openly, but it is technically feasible to perform the reconnection laparoscopically after a previous Hartmann's operation [23].

    Studies show that the reversal of a temporary ileostomy can be performed early and safely at the latest 12 weeks after creation. However, the latency between creation and reversal is often longer, and in 9 to 57% of patients, reversal does not occur at all [11, 16, 18, 46]. Older patient age, lower body mass index, increased comorbidity, the presence of an end stoma, and neoadjuvant radiation therapy are all identified as independent factors for the absence of reversal [11, 12, 26]. Progressive tumor disease, complications during the primary procedure, and especially anastomotic insufficiency are further causes for leaving a stoma [16, 28].

    There are currently no recommendations in the literature for the optimal timing of ileostomy reversal, and handling varies greatly depending on the clinic [32]. Inflammatory adhesions between the bowel and abdominal wall, as well as between the bowel loops, make early stoma closure 10 to 14 days after creation difficult. According to experience, inflammatory adhesions take at least 6 to 10 weeks to regress, which justifies the recommendation to plan the reversal about 3 months after stoma creation.

    Some studies have shown that in selected patients who recovered quickly after the primary operation, the stoma could be reversed as early as 1 to 2 weeks later without increasing morbidity or mortality, which positively affected quality of life and possible stoma complications [9, 15]. In principle, the period between stoma creation and reversal should be kept as short as possible. Reversal requires evidence of complete healing of the downstream anastomosis through endoscopy and imaging, and the patient must have sufficiently recovered.

    A prospective randomized study investigated the prognostically favorable timing of stoma reversal in patients with adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer after low anterior resection [42]. A colostomy should be reversed no earlier than 6 months after discontinuity resection. If severe peritonitis occurs, one should wait between 9 and 12 months to ensure that patients have sufficiently recovered and the extent of potential adhesions is minimized.

    Some working groups reported an increase in complication rates with a longer delay between stoma creation and continuity restoration, which is partly due to atrophy of the rectal stump and associated technical difficulties [36, 41, 48]. However, the clinical and nutritional status of the patient improves with delayed reanastomosis, leading to fewer complications, as shown in several studies [6, 36].

    Loop Stoma: In terms of morbidity, hand-sewn and stapler sutures are equivalent. Stapler anastomosis appears to be associated with a shorter operation time and a lower postoperative obstruction rate, but also with higher costs [27, 29]. Compared to side-to-side anastomosis, hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis was associated with higher morbidity and longer hospital stays [39]. The data on skin closure after ileostomy reversal show that the purse-string skin suture is significantly better in terms of septic wound complications than linear skin closure, with no differences in hernia rate, operation time, hospital stay, and patient quality of life [17, 40].

    Hartmann Situation: A review with data from 450 operations for the laparoscopic approach in continuity restoration showed lower morbidity and shorter hospital stays compared to relaparotomy, indicating that the laparoscopic approach can be used as a safe alternative with appropriate expertise [45]. Reanastomosis can be performed with low morbidity and particularly low anastomotic insufficiency once patients have sufficiently recovered [19, 31]. Generally, continuity restoration can be performed after sigmoid discontinuity resection once the left flexure is mobilized and, if necessary, ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery and vein is performed. In some cases, resection of the transverse colon involving the middle colic artery and vein with ascending rectostomy is required to ensure a tension-free anastomosis. The need for a temporary loop ileostomy must be assessed based on the patient's general and nutritional status.

     

  2. Currently ongoing studies on this topic

  3. Literature on this Topic

    1. BARMER GEK (2013) Report on Therapeutic and Assistive Devices

    2. ILCO Stoma. https://www.ilco.de. 01/2018

    3. Arolfo S, Borgiotto C, Bosio G, Mistrangelo M, Allaix ME, Morino M. Preoperative stoma site marking: a simple practice to reduce stoma-related complications. Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Sep;22(9):683-687.

    4. Bafford AC, Irani JL. Management and complications of stomas. Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Feb;93(1):145-66.

    5. Baker ML, Williams RN, Nightingale JM. Causes and management of a high-output stoma. Colorectal Dis. 2011 Feb;13(2):191-7.

    6. Banerjee S, Leather AJ, Rennie JA, Samano N, Gonzalez JG, Papagrigoriadis S. Feasibility and morbidity of reversal of Hartmann's. Colorectal Dis. 2005 Sep;7(5):454-9

    7. Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Aufenacker TJ, van Geldere D, Lammeren FM, Mahabier C, Makai P, Steenvoorde P, de Vries Reilingh TS, Wiezer MJ, de Wilt JH, Bleichrodt RP, Rosman C; Dutch Prevent Study group. Prophylactic Mesh Placement During Formation of an End-colostomy Reduces the Rate of Parastomal Hernia: Short-term Results of the Dutch PREVENT-trial. Ann Surg. 2017 Apr;265(4):663-669.

    8. Cottam J, Richards K, Hasted A, Blackman A. Results of a nationwide prospective audit of stoma complications within 3 weeks of surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):834-8.

    9. Danielsen AK, Park J, Jansen JE, Bock D, Skullman S, Wedin A, Marinez AC, Haglind E, Angenete E, Rosenberg J. Early Closure of a Temporary Ileostomy in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):284-290.

    10. Danielsen AK, Burcharth J, Rosenberg J. Patient education has a positive effect in patients with a stoma: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jun;15(6):e276-83.

    11. David GG, Slavin JP, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Khan AU, Selvasekar CR. Loop ileostomy following anterior resection: is it really temporary? Colorectal Dis. 2010 May;12(5):428-32.

    12. den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KC, Kranenbarg EM, Rutten HJ, Wiggers T, Putter H, van de Velde CJ; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Apr;8(4):297-303.

    13. Dong LR, Zhu YM, Xu Q, Cao CX, Zhang BZ. Clinical evaluation of extraperitoneal colostomy without damaging the muscle layer of the abdominal wall. J Int Med Res.2012;40(4):1410-6

    14. Doughty D. Principles of ostomy management in the oncology patient. J Support Oncol. 2005 Jan-Feb;3(1):59-69.

    15. Farag S, Rehman S, Sains P, Baig MK, Sajid MS. Early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resections: an integrated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;19(12):1050-1057.

    16. Floodeen H, Lindgren R, Matthiessen P. When are defunctioning stomas in rectal cancer surgery really reversed? Results from a population-based single center experience. Scand J Surg. 2013;102(4):246-50.

    17. Gachabayov M, Lee H, Chudner A, Dyatlov A, Zhang N, Bergamaschi R. Purse-string vs. linear skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Mar;23(3):207-220.

    18. Gessler B, Haglind E, Angenete E. Loop ileostomies in colorectal cancer patients--morbidity and risk factors for nonreversal. J Surg Res. 2012 Dec;178(2):708-14.

    19. Hallam S, Mothe BS, Tirumulaju R. Hartmann's procedure, reversal and rate of stoma-free survival. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Apr;100(4):301-307.

    20. Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, Groenewoud HM, Buyne OR, de Hingh IH, Bleichrodt RP. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):685-95.

    21. Harish K. The loop stoma bridge--a new technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 May;12(5):958-61.

    22. Hauters P, Cardin JL, Lepere M, Valverde A, Cossa JP, Auvray S. Prevention of parastomal hernia by intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement at the time of stoma formation. Hernia. 2012 Dec;16(6):655-60.

    23. Köhler L, Lempa M, Troidl H. [Laparoscopically guided reversal of Hartmann's procedure]. Chirurg. 1999 Oct;70(10):1139-43.

    24. Kwiatt M, Kawata M. Avoidance and management of stomal complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013 Jun;26(2):112-21.

    25. Lafreniere R, Ketcham AS. The Penrose drain: a safe, atraumatic colostomy bridge. Am J Surg. 1985 Feb;149(2):288-91.

    26. Lindgren R, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R, Matthiessen P. What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jan;54(1):41-7.

    27. Löffler T, Rossion I, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Koch M, von Frankenberg M, Pochhammer J, Thomusch O, Kijak T, Simon T, Mihaljevic AL, Krüger M, Stein E, Prechtl G, Hodina R, Michal W, Strunk R, Henkel K, Bunse J, Jaschke G, Politt D, Heistermann HP, et al. HAnd Suture Versus STApling for Closure of Loop Ileostomy (HASTA Trial): results of a multicenter randomized trial (DRKS00000040). AnnSurg. 2012 Nov;256(5):828-35.

    28. Mohammed Ilyas MI, Haggstrom DA, Maggard-Gibbons MA, Wendel CS, Rawl S, Schmidt CM, Ko CY, Krouse RS. Patients With Temporary Ostomies: Veterans Administration Hospitals Multi-institutional Retrospective Study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2018 Nov/Dec;45(6):510-515.

    29. Nemeth ZH, Bogdanovski DA, Hicks AS, Paglinco SR, Sawhney R, Pilip SA, Stopper PB, Rolandelli RH. Outcome and Cost Analysis of Hand-Sewn and Stapled Anastomoses in the Reversal of Loop Ileostomy. Am Surg. 2018 May 1;84(5):615-619.

    30. Ng KH, Ng DC, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Yau KK, Chung CC, Li MK. Obstructive complications of laparoscopically created defunctioning ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov;51(11):1664-8.

    31. Onder A, Gorgun E, Costedio M, Kessler H, Stocchi L, Benlice C, Remzi F. Comparison of Short-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann Reversal: A Case-matched Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Aug;26(4):e75-9.

    32. Ostomy Guidelines Task Force., Goldberg M, Aukett LK, Carmel J, Fellows J, Folkedahl B, Pittman J, Palmer R. Management of the patient with a fecal ostomy: best practice guideline for clinicians. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;37(6):596-8.

    33. Pachler J, Wille-Jørgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD004323

    34. Park J, Danielsen AK, Angenete E, Bock D, Marinez AC, Haglind E, Jansen JE, Skullman S, Wedin A, Rosenberg J. Quality of life in a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial). Br J Surg. 2018 Feb;105(3):244-251.

    35. Parmar KL, Zammit M, Smith A, Kenyon D, Lees NP; Greater Manchester and Cheshire Colorectal Cancer Network. A prospective audit of early stoma complications in colorectal cancer treatment throughout the Greater Manchester and Cheshire colorectal cancer network. Colorectal Dis. 2011 Aug;13(8):935-8.

    36. Pearce NW, Scott SD, Karran SJ. Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Br J Surg. 1992 Aug;79(8):839-41.

    37. Persson E, Berndtsson I, Carlsson E, Hallén AM, Lindholm E. Stoma-related complications and stoma size - a 2-year follow up. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Oct;12(10):971-6

    38. Popek S, Grant M, Gemmill R, Wendel CS, Mohler MJ, Rawl SM, Baldwin CM, Ko CY, Schmidt CM, Krouse RS. Overcoming challenges: life with an ostomy. Am J Surg. 2010 Nov;200(5):640-5.

    39. Prassas D, Ntolia A, Spiekermann JD, Rolfs TM, Schumacher FJ. Reversal of Diverting Loop Ileostomy Using Hand-Sewn Side-to-Side versus End-to-End Anastomosis after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Single Center Experience. Am Surg. 2018 Nov 1;84(11):1741-1744.

    40. Rausa E, Kelly ME, Sgroi G, Lazzari V, Aiolfi A, Cavalcoli F, Bonitta G, Bonavina L. Quality of life following ostomy reversal with purse-string vs linear skin closure: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Feb;34(2):209-216.

    41. Roque-Castellano C, Marchena-Gomez J, Hemmersbach-Miller M, Acosta-Merida A, Rodriguez-Mendez A, Fariña-Castro R, Hernandez-Romero J. Analysis of the factors related to the decision of restoring intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Sep;22(9):1091-6.

    42. Sandra-Petrescu F, Herrle F, Hinke A, Rossion I, Suelberg H, Post S, Hofheinz RD, Kienle P. CoCStom trial: study protocol for a randomised trial comparing completeness of adjuvant chemotherapy after early versus late diverting stoma closure in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 21;15:923.

    43. Scarpa M, Sadocchi L, Ruffolo C, Iacobone M, Filosa T, Prando D, Polese L, Frego M, D'Amico DF, Angriman I. Rod in loop ileostomy: just an insignificant detail for ileostomy-related complications? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;392(2):149-54.

    44. Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Oct;12(10):958-64.

    45. Siddiqui MR, Sajid MS, Baig MK. Open vs laparoscopic approach for reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Aug;12(8):733-41.

    46. Sier MF, van Gelder L, Ubbink DT, Bemelman WA, Oostenbroek RJ. Factors affecting timing of closure and non-reversal of temporary ileostomies. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Sep;30(9):1185-92

    47. Speirs M, Leung E, Hughes D, Robertson I, Donnelly L, Mackenzie I, Macdonald A. Ileostomy rod--is it a bridge too far? Colorectal Dis. 2006 Jul;8(6):484-7.

    48. Tan WS, Lim JF, Tang CL, Eu KW. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: experience in an Asian population. Singapore Med J. 2012 Jan;53(1):46-51.

    49. Whitehead A, Cataldo PA. Technical Considerations in Stoma Creation. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017 Jul;30(3):162-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598156. Epub 2017 May 22

    50. Young CJ, Eyers AA, Solomon MJ. Defunctioning of the anorectum: historical controlled study of laparoscopic vs. open procedures. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Feb;41(2):190-4.

    51. Younis J, Salerno G, Fanto D, Hadjipavlou M, Chellar D, Trickett JP. Focused preoperative patient stoma education, prior to ileostomy formation after anterior resection, contributes to a reduction in delayed discharge within the enhanced recovery programme. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jan;27(1):43-7.

  4. Reviews

    Chudner A, Gachabayov M, Dyatlov A, Lee H, Essani R, Bergamaschi R. The influence of diverting loop ileostomy vs. colostomy on postoperative morbidity in restorative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Mar;404(2):129-139.

    Ge Z, Zhao X, Liu Z, Yang G, Wu Q, Wang X, Zhang X, Cheng Z, Wang K. Complications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and systematic review. BMC Surg. 2023 Aug 12;23(1):235.

    Lambrichts DP, Edomskis PP, van der Bogt RD, Kleinrensink GJ, Bemelman WA, Lange JF. Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann's procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Aug;35(8):1371-1386.

    Lawday S, Flamey N, Fowler GE, Leaning M, Dyar N, Daniels IR, Smart NJ, Hyde C. Quality of life in restorative versus non-restorative resections for rectal cancer: systematic review. BJS Open. 2021 Nov 9;5(6). pii: zrab101.

    Luo J, Singh D, Zhang F, Yang X, Zha X, Jiang H, Yang L, Yang H. Comparison of the extraperitoneal and transperitoneal routes for permanent colostomy: a meta-analysis with RCTs and systematic review. World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar 12;20(1):82.

    McKechnie T, Lee J, Lee Y, Doumouras A, Amin N, Hong D, Eskicioglu C. Prophylactic Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia Following End Colostomy: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Feb;26(2):486-502.

    Niu N, Du S, Yang D, Zhang L, Wu B, Zhi X, Li J, Xu D, Zhang Y, Meng A. Risk factors for the development of a parastomal hernia in patients with enterostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Mar;37(3):507-519.

    Peltrini R, Imperatore N, Altieri G, Castiglioni S, Di Nuzzo MM, Grimaldi L, D'Ambra M, Lionetti R, Bracale U, Corcione F. Prevention of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure with different reinforcing mesh types: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):639-648.

    Zhang Y, Liu C, Nistala KRY, Chong CS. Open versus laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Dec;37(12):2421-2430.

  5. Guidelines

  6. literature search

    Literature search on the pages of pubmed.