Start your free 3-day trial — no credit card required, full access included

Evidence - Flexor tendon suture according to Kirchmayr-Kessler

  1. Summary of the Literature

    Principles and Technique of Flexor Tendon Repair

    Adhesions and scarring between the tendon and surrounding tissue, especially in the area of the flexor tendon sheaths, are the main problem in flexor tendon surgery. Adhesions can only be avoided by early mobilization of the tendon through passive, preferably active, rehabilitation concepts [1]. Since the suture site is mechanically stressed even before the tendon has healed, high demands are placed on the stability of the suture.

    If there is a rupture of the suture site, this is due to mechanical overload of the suture material in 80% of cases. Knot formations can reduce strength by up to 50% and lead to a significant weakening of the suture material [2]. In 20% of cases, the rupture of the suture site is due to a tear-out of the suture from the tendon tissue.

    During functional rehabilitation, a gradual dehiscence may develop, i.e., a separation of the tendon stumps without rupture of the suture site. Dehiscences are caused by the loosening of the suture in the tendon and intratendinous scar formation. Scars within the tendon represent a weak point that can lead to a later functionally disturbing overlength of the tendons. If the dehiscence is more than 3 mm, the strength of the suture does not increase after the 10th postoperative day, leading to a high risk of rupture [3].

    Factors that can significantly impair the gliding ability of the suture include:

    • swelling of the suture site caused by overly tight core suture
    • introduction of excessive amounts of suture material
    • suture material and knots not embedded in the tendon tissue
    • protruding fibers from the tendon stumps in the suture area
    • dehiscences (see above)

    The gliding ability of the tendon after reconstruction depends on the following parameters:

    • technique of the core suture
    • number of suture strands
    • suture thickness, suture material
    • technique of fine adaptation

    For the technique of the core suture, it is true that thread guides, in which the thread encompasses the tendon fibers so that the loop closes when the suture is tightened (so-called locking suture), are significantly more stable than encircling sutures (10 – 50% [4, 5]). A classic example is the Kirchmayr-Kessler suture [6, 7]. The loop diameter should be greater than 2 mm, otherwise the loop may tear out [8]. Locking intermediate sutures can further increase suture strength but lead to uneven tension distribution in the suture, which can lead to overloading of tendon strands [9].

    The strength of a suture increases with the strength of the suture material. Measurements on braided polyester threads show that the strength of a 4/0 suture is 64% higher than that of a 5/0 suture. A 3/0 thread has 43% higher tear strength than a 4/0 thread, a 2/0 thread compared to 3/0 by 63% [10]. Threads of 5/0 strength are not suitable for core sutures due to their low strength [11].

    With the number of loops and knot formations within the tendon, the strength of a flexor tendon suture increases [12]. These interactions between thread and tendon are referred to as anchor points. Suture techniques with a significantly higher number of anchor points compared to the simple Kirchmayr-Kessler suture increase the stability of tendon reconstruction [13].

    Various biomechanical studies have shown that the tear resistance of a flexor tendon suture increases proportionally with the number of suture strands, but decreases between the 5th and 21st day, independent of the number of suture strands, although at different levels depending on the suture technique [2, 14]. For postoperative care after flexor tendon suture, this means:

    • The tear resistance of a two-strand suture is sufficient for the stresses of passive rehabilitation, but not for active rehabilitation without resistance.
    • Only from a four-strand suture is there sufficient tear resistance for active rehabilitation without resistance.
    • No suture technique offers sufficient stability for maximum force application.
    601-A-02

    For the position of the knots, they should be embedded in the tendon. Regarding tendon gliding ability, it is most favorable if the knots are located in the suture site itself. However, this causes some dehiscence, and a knot reduces the contact area of the tendon stumps. If two knots are placed in the suture site, the contact area is reduced by up to 27%, with the eight-strand suture according to Savage by up to 18%, with the Kirchmayr-Kessler suture by 2% [15, 16]. However, it is generally not a problem to embed the knot outside the suture site as in the modification of the Kirchmayr-Kessler suture according to Zechner, demonstrated in the OP procedure, step 6 in the clip [17].

    The durability of the tendon suture also depends on the knot technique. A surgical knot tied 4 times is recommended [12]. A knot tied 4 times per suture provides higher tear resistance than multiple knots per suture, which is attributed to uneven distribution of suture tension and a decrease in tear resistance in the knot itself [2, 18, 19]. Placing the sutures in the dorsal portions of the tendon is said to lead to higher stability [20, 21].

    After a tendon transection, degenerative changes occur in the adjacent sections of the tendon stumps, leading to a decrease in strength, which is why the anchor points should not be placed too close to the tendon stump. The most favorable position of the anchor points is at a distance of 7 to 10 mm from the tendon stump. A greater distance (> 12 mm) does not result in greater strength [22, 23].

    After performing the core suture, a circumferential fine adaptation should be performed to smooth the surface, increase tear resistance, and prevent dehiscences, in which the superficial tendon portions are inverted [24, 25, 26]. Fine adaptation must be performed with the finest suture material to not impair the gliding ability of the tendon by the external suture material.

    There is currently no consensus on the optimal suture material for flexor tendon surgery. Commonly used non-absorbable suture materials include braided polyester threads, monofilament nylon, monofilament polypropylene, and threads made of braided polyethylene. For absorbable threads, sufficient material endurance must be considered, which is achieved, among others, by polydioxanone and polylactide [27, 28, 29].

    Principles for Performing Flexor Tendon Sutures

    more favorable

    less favorable

    Thread course in the tendon

    locking sutures, locking intermediate knots

    encircling sutures

    Strength of the suture material

    thread strength 3/0 and 4/0

    thread strength 5/0 and 2/0

    Anchor points

    large number, e.g., cross-stitch suture according to Becker

    small number, e.g., Kirchmayr-Kessler suture

    Number of suture strands

    ≥ 4

    2

    Knot position

    in the tendon

    outside the tendon

    Distance of anchor point from tendon stump

    7-10 mm

    < 7 mm

    circumferential fine adaptation suture

    yes

    none

  2. Currently ongoing studies on this topic

  3. Literature on this topic

    1. Duran RJ, Houser RG (1975) Controlled passive motion following flexor tendon repair in zones 2 and 3. In: Surgeons AAO (Eds) Symposium on tendon surgery in the hand. Mosby, Philadelphia, pp. 105–114

    2. Urbaniak JR, Cahill JD, Mortenson RA (1975) Tendon suturing methods: analysis of tensile strength. In: Surgeons AAoO (Eds) Symposium on tendon surgery in the hand. Mosby, St. Louis, pp. 70–80

    3. Gelberman RH, Boyer MI, Brodt MD, Winters SC, Silva MJ (1999) The effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and excursion of intrasynovial flexor tendons. An experimental study on the early stages of tendon-healing in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:975–982

    4. Hatanaka H, Manske PR (1999) Effect of the cross-sectional area of locking loops in flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 24:751–760

    5. Hotokezaka S, Manske PR (1997) Differences between locking loops and grasping loops: effects on 2-strand core suture. J Hand Surg Am 22:995–1003

    6. Kirchmayr L (1917) On the technique of tendon suturing. Zentralblatt Chirurgie 44:906–907

    7. Kessler I (1973) The “grasping technique” for tendon repair. Hand 5:253–255

    8. Xie RG, Tang JB (2005) Investigation of locking configurations for tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 30:461–465

    9. Betz C, Schleicher P, Winkel R, Hoffmann R (2013) Biomechanical investigation of the tensile strength of tendon sutures - blocking intermediate knots increase stability. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 45:20–25

    10. Taras JS, Raphael JS, Marcyk SDBW, Culp RW (1997) Evaluation of suture caliber in flexor tendon repair. In: Hunter M, Schneider LH, Mackin EJ (Eds) Tendon and nerve surgery in the hand. Mosby, St. Louis

    11. Wu YF, Tang JB (2014) Recent developments in flexor tendon repair techniques and factors influencing strength of the tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 39:6–19

    12. Savage R (2014) The search for the ideal tendon repair in zone 2: strand number, anchor points, and suture thickness. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 39:20–29

    13. Greenwald DP, Randolph MA, Hong HZ, May JW Jr (1995) Augmented Becker versus modified Kessler tenorrhaphy in monkeys: dynamic mechanical analysis. J Hand Surg Am 20:267–272

    14. Strickland JW (2000) Development of flexor tendon surgery: twenty-five years of progress. J Hand Surg 25:214–235

    15. Savage R (1985) In vitro studies of a new method of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br 10:135–141

    16. Norris SR, Ellis FD, Chen MI, Seiler JG III (1999) Flexor tendon suture methods: a quantitative analysis of suture material within the repair site. Orthopedics 22:413–416

    17. Zechner W, Buck-Gramcko D, Lohmann H, Goth D, Stock W (1985) Considerations for improving suture techniques in flexor tendon injuries. Clinical and experimental study. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 17:8–13

    18. Gibbons CE, Thompson D, Sandow MJ (2009) Flexor tenorrhaphy tensile strength: reduction by cyclic loading: in vitro and ex vivo porcine study. Hand (NY) 4:113–118

    19. Rees L, Matthews A, Masouros SD, Bull AM, Haywood R (2009) Comparison of 1- and 2-knot, 4-strand, double-modified Kessler tendon repairs in a porcine model. J Hand Surg Am 34:705–709

    20. Soejima O, Diao E, Lotz JC, Hariharan JS (1995) Comparative mechanical analysis of dorsal versus palmar placement of core suture for flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am 20:801–807

    21. Aoki M, Manske PR, Pruitt DL, Larson BJ (1995) Work of flexion after tendon repair with various suture methods. A human cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Br 20:310–313

    22. Tan J, Tang JB (2004) Locking repairs for obliquely cut tendons: effects of suture purchase and directions of locking circles. J Hand Surg Am 29:891–897

    23. Lee SK, Goldstein RY, Zingman A et al (2010) The effects of core suture purchase on the biomechanical characteristics of a multistrand locking flexor tendon repair: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am 35:1165–1171

    24. Lister GD, Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, Atasoy E (1977) Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization. J Hand Surg Am 2:441–451

    25. Geldmacher J, Köckerling F (1991) Restoration procedures on tendons and their application after injuries of flexor tendons of the hand. In: Tendon Surgery. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Munich, pp. 110–152

    26. Diao E, Hariharan JS, Soejima O, Lotz JC (1996) Effect of peripheral suture depth on strength of tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am 21:234–239

    27. Bruck JC, Schlögel R (1985) Experiences with absorbable suture material (PDS) in tendon sutures. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 17:238–240

    28. Wada A, Kubota H, Taketa M, Miuri H, Iwamoto Y (2002) Comparison of the mechanical properties of polyglycolide-trimethylene carbonate (Maxon) and polydioxanone sutures (PDS2) used for flexor tendon repair and active mobilization. J Hand Surg Br 27:329–332

    29. O’Broin ES, Earley MJ, Smyth H, Hooper AC (1995) Absorbable sutures in tendon repair. A comparison of PDS with prolene in rabbit tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br 20:505–508

  4. Reviews

    Tang JB. Rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and others: a safe and efficient protocol. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2021 Oct;46(8):813-817.

    Li ZJ, Yang QQ, Zhou YL. Basic Research on Tendon Repair: Strategies, Evaluation, and Development. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 28;8:664909

    Tang JB, Lalonde D, Harhaus L, Sadek AF, Moriya K, Pan ZJ. Flexor tendon repair: recent changes and current methods. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2022 Jan;47(1):31-39.

    Kher S, Graham DJ, Symes M, Lawson R, Sivakumar BS. Outcomes of Isolated Digital Flexor Tenolysis: A Systematic Review. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2021 Dec;26(4):580-587

    Xu H, Huang X, Guo Z, Zhou H, Jin H, Huang X. Outcome of Surgical Repair and Rehabilitation of Flexor Tendon Injuries in Zone II of the Hand: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Feb 4. pii: S0363-5023(21)00755-3.

    Tang JB. Investigations into flexor tendon repair: a research journey over three decades. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2022 Jun;47(6):568-579

    Mallina R, Bamford E, Shelton I, Selby A, Russell P, Johnson N. A Review of Outcome Reporting Practices after Flexor Tendon Repair in Zones 1 and 2. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022 Apr;27(2):226-232.

    Suszynski TM, Coutinho D, Kaufmann RA. Flexor Tendon Repair in Zone II Augmented With an Externalized Detensioning Suture: Protected Flexor Tendon Repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Mar 11. pii: S0363-5023(23)00041-2.

  5. Guidelines

    none

  6. literature search

    Literature search on the pages of pubmed.