Start your free 3-day trial — no credit card required, full access included

Evidence - Flexor tendon suture according to Kirchmayr-Kessler

  1. Summary of the Literature

    Principles and Technique of Flexor Tendon Suture

    Adhesions and scarring between the tendon and surrounding tissue, especially in the area of the flexor tendon sheaths, are the main problem in flexor tendon surgery. Adhesions can only be avoided by early movement of the tendon through passive, or better yet active, postoperative treatment concepts [1]. Since the suture site is mechanically loaded before the tendon has healed, high demands are placed on the stability of the suture.

    If a rupture of the suture site occurs, this is due to mechanical overload of the suture material in 80% of cases. Knot formations can reduce the strength by up to 50% and lead to a significant weakening of the suture material [2]. In 20% of cases, the rupture of the suture site is due to the suture pulling out of the tendon tissue.

    In the context of functional postoperative treatment, a creeping dehiscence can develop, i.e., a separation of the tendon stumps without rupture of the suture site. Dehiscences are caused by loosening of the suture in the tendon as well as intratendinous scar formation. Scars within the tendon represent a weak point that can lead to a later functionally disturbing elongation of the tendons. If the dehiscence is more than 3 mm, the strength of the suture no longer increases from the 10th postoperative day, which leads to a high risk of rupture [3].

    Factors that can significantly impair the gliding ability of the suture include:

    • bulging of the suture site due to overly tight pulling of the core suture
    • introduction of excessive amounts of suture material
    • suture material and knots not buried in the tendon tissue
    • protruding fibers from the tendon stumps in the suture area
    • dehiscences (see above)

    The gliding ability of the tendon after reconstruction depends on the following parameters:

    • technique of the core suture
    • number of suture strands
    • suture thickness, suture material
    • technique of fine adaptation

    For the technique of the core suture, it holds that thread guides in which the thread encircles the tendon fibers in such a way that tightening the suture results in closure of the loop (so-called locking suture) are significantly more stable than encircling sutures (10 – 50% [4, 5]). A classic example is the suture according to Kirchmayr-Kessler [6, 7]. The loop diameter should be larger than 2 mm, otherwise the loop can tear out [8]. Locking intermediate sutures can further increase the suture strength, but lead to uneven tension distribution in the suture, which can result in overloading of tendon strands [9].

    The strength of a suture increases with the thickness of the suture material. Measurements on braided polyester threads show that the strength of a suture of thickness 4/0 is 64% higher than that of thickness 5/0. A thread of thickness 3/0 has a 43% higher tensile strength than a thread of thickness 4/0, a thread of thickness 2/0 compared to 3/0 by 63% [10]. Threads of thickness 5/0 are not suitable for core sutures due to their low strength [11].

    The strength of a flexor tendon suture increases with the number of loops and knot formations within the tendon [12]. These interactions between thread and tendon are referred to as anchor points. Suture techniques with a significantly higher number of anchor points compared to the simple Kirchmayr-Kessler suture increase the stability of the tendon reconstruction [13].

    Various biomechanical studies have shown that the tensile strength of a flexor tendon suture increases proportionally to the number of suture strands, but decreases between the 5th and 21st day independently of the number of suture strands, although at different levels depending on the suture technique [2, 14]. For postoperative treatment after flexor tendon suture, this means:

    • The tensile strength of a two-strand suture is sufficient for the loads of passive postoperative treatment, but not for active postoperative treatment without resistance.
    • Only from a four-strand suture is there sufficient tensile strength for active postoperative treatment without resistance.
    • No suture technique offers sufficient stability for maximum force application.
    601-A-02

    For the position of the knots, it holds that they should be buried in the tendon. Regarding tendon gliding ability, it should be most favorable if the knots are located in the suture site itself. However, this causes a certain dehiscence, and a knot also reduces the contact surface of the tendon stumps. If two knots are placed in the suture site, the contact surface is reduced by up to 27%, in the eight-strand suture according to Savage by up to 18%, in the Kirchmayr-Kessler suture by 2% [15, 16]. However, it is usually not a problem to bury the knot outside the suture site, as in the modification of the Kirchmayr-Kessler suture according to Zechner, which is demonstrated in the surgical procedure, step 6 in the clip [17].

    The durability of the tendon suture also depends on the knot technique. A surgical knot that is tied 4 times is recommended [12]. A 4-time tied knot per suture results in higher tensile strength than multiple knots per suture, which is attributed to uneven distribution of suture tension and a decrease in tensile strength in the knot itself [2, 18, 19]. Placement of the sutures in the dorsal portions of the tendon is said to lead to higher stability [20, 21].

    After tendon transection, degenerative changes occur in the adjacent sections of the tendon stumps, leading to a decrease in strength, which is why the anchor points should not be placed too close to the tendon stump. The most favorable position of the anchor points is at a distance of 7 to 10 mm from the tendon stump. A greater distance (> 12 mm) does not result in greater strength [22, 23].

    After performing the core suture, a circumferential fine adaptation should be carried out to smooth the surface, increase tensile strength, and avoid dehiscences, in which the superficial tendon portions are inverted [24, 25, 26]. The fine adaptation must be performed with the finest suture material to not impair the gliding ability of the tendon by the externally located suture material.

    There is currently no consensus on an optimal suture material for flexor tendon surgery. Among the currently frequently used non-resorbable suture materials are braided polyester threads, monofilament nylon, monofilament polypropylene, and threads made of braided polyethylene. For resorbable threads, sufficient durability of the material must be ensured, which is achieved, among others, by polydioxanone and polylactide [27, 28, 29].

    Principles for Performing Flexor Tendon Sutures

    rather favorable

    rather unfavorable

    Thread path in the tendon

    locking sutures, locking intermediate knots

    encircling sutures

    Thickness of the suture material

    thread thickness 3/0 and 4/0

    thread thickness 5/0 and 2/0

    Anchor points

    large number, e.g., cross-stitch suture acc. to Becker

    small number, e.g., Kirchmayr-Kessler suture

    Number of suture strands

    ≥ 4

    2

    Knot position

    in the tendon

    outside the tendon

    Distance of anchor point from tendon stump

    7-10 mm

    < 7 mm

    circumferential fine adaptation suture

    yes

    none

  2. Currently ongoing studies on this topic

  3. Literature on this topic

    1. Duran RJ, Houser RG (1975) Controlled passive motion following flexor tendon repair in zones 2 and 3. In: Surgeons AAO (eds) Symposium on tendon surgery in the hand.Mosby, Philadelphia, pp.105–114

    2. Urbaniak JR, Cahill JD, Mortenson RA (1975) Tendon suturing methods: analysis of tensile strength. In: Surgeons AAoO (eds) Symposium on tendon surgery in the hand. Mosby, St.Louis, pp.70–80

    3. Gelberman RH, Boyer MI, Brodt MD, Winters SC, Silva MJ (1999) The effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and excursion of intrasynovial flexor tendons. An experimental study on the early stages of tendon-healing in dogs. JBoneJointSurgAm81:975–982

    4. Hatanaka H,Manske PR (1999) Effect of the crosssectional area of locking loops in flexor tendon repair. JHandSurgAm24:751–760

    5. Hotokezaka S, Manske PR (1997) Differences between locking loops and grasping loops: effects on 2-strand core suture. J Hand Surg Am 22:995–1003

    6. Kirchmayr L (1917) On the technique of tendon suture. ZentralblattChirurgie 44:906–907

    7. Kessler I (1973) The “grasping technique” for tendonrepair.Hand5:253–255

    8. Xie RG, Tang JB (2005) Investigation of locking configurations for tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 30:461–465

    9. Betz C, Schleicher P,Winkel R, Hoffmann R (2013) Biomechanical investigation of the tensile strength of tendon sutures - blocking intermediate knots increase stability. HandchirMikrochirPlast Chir 45:20–25

    10. Taras JS, Raphael JS,Marcyk SDBW, CulpRW(1997) Evaluation of suture caliber in flexor tendon repair. In: Hunter M, Schneider LH, Mackin EJ (eds) Tendon and nerve surgery in the hand. Mosby, St.Louis

    11. Wu YF, Tang JB (2014) Recent developments in flexor tendon repair techniques and factors influencing strength of the tendon repair. J Hand SurgEurVol 39:6–19

    12. Savage R (2014) The search for the ideal tendon repair in zone 2: strand number, anchor points and suture thickness. JHandSurgEurVol 39:20–29

    13. Greenwald DP, Randolph MA, Hong HZ, May JW Jr (1995) Augmented Becker versus modified Kessler tenorrhaphy in monkeys: dynamic mechanical analysis. JHandSurgAm20:267–272

    14. Strickland JW (2000) Development of flexor tendon surgery: twenty-five years ofprogress. JHand Surg 25:214–235

    15. Savage R (1985) In vitro studies of a new method of flexor tendon repair. JHandSurgBr 10:135–141

    16. Norris SR, Ellis FD, Chen MI, Seiler JGIII (1999) Flexor tendon suture methods: a quantitative analysis of suture materialwithin the repair site.Orthopedics 22:413–416

    17. ZechnerW, Buck-Gramcko D, Lohmann H, Goth D, Stock W (1985) Considerations for improving suture technique in flexor tendon injuries. Clinical and experimental study. HandchirMikrochirPlastChir 17:8–13

    18. Gibbons CE, Thompson D, Sandow MJ (2009) Flexor tenorrhaphy tensile strength: reduction by cyclic loading: in vitroandex vivoporcine study.Hand (NY)4:113–118

    19. Rees L, Matthews A, Masouros SD, Bull AM, Haywood R(2009) Comparison of 1- and 2-knot, 4- strand, double-modified kessler tendon repairs in aporcine model. JHandSurgAm34:705–709

    20. Soejima O, Diao E, Lotz JC, Hariharan JS (1995) Comparative mechanical analysis of dorsal versus palmar placement of core suture for flexor tendon repairs. JHandSurgAm20:801–807

    21. Aoki M, Manske PR, Pruitt DL, Larson BJ (1995) Work of flexion after tendon repair with various suture methods.Ahuman cadaveric study. JHandSurg Br 20:310–313

    22. Tan J, Tang JB (2004) Locking repairs for obliquely cut tendons: effects of suture purchase and directions of locking circles. J Hand Surg Am 29:891–897

    23. Lee SK, Goldstein RY, Zingman A et al (2010) The effects of core suture purchase on the biomechanical characteristics of a multistrand locking flexor tendon repair: a cadaveric study. J HandSurgAm35:1165–1171

    24. Lister GD, Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, Atasoy E (1977) Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization. J Hand Surg Am 2:441–451

    25. Geldmacher J, Köckerling F (1991)Reconstructive procedures on tendons and their application after injuries to flexor tendons of the hand. In: Tendon surgery. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Munich, pp.110–152

    26. Diao E, Hariharan JS, Soejima O, Lotz JC (1996) Effect of peripheral suture depth on strength of tendon repairs. JHandSurgAm21:234–239

    27. Bruck JC, Schlögel R (1985) Experiences with absorbable suture material (PDS) in tendon sutures. HandchirMikrochirPlastChir 17:238–240

    28. Wada A, Kubota H, Taketa M, Miuri H, Iwamoto Y (2002) Comparison of the mechanical properties of polyglycolide-trimethylene carbonate (Maxon) and polydioxanone sutures (PDS2) used for flexor tendon repair and activemobilization. JHand Surg Br 27:329–332

    29. O’Broin ES, EarleyMJ, Smyth H, Hooper AC (1995) Absorbable sutures in tendon repair. A comparison of PDS with prolene in rabbit tendon repair. JHand SurgBr 20:505–508

  4. Reviews

    Tang JB. Rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and others: a safe and efficient protocol. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2021 Oct;46(8):813-817.

    Li ZJ, Yang QQ, Zhou YL. Basic Research on Tendon Repair: Strategies, Evaluation, and Development. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 28;8:664909

    Tang JB, Lalonde D, Harhaus L, Sadek AF, Moriya K, Pan ZJ. Flexor tendon repair:  recent changes and current methods. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2022 Jan;47(1):31-39.

    Kher S, Graham DJ, Symes M, Lawson R, Sivakumar BS. Outcomes of Isolated Digital Flexor Tenolysis: A Systematic Review. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2021 Dec;26(4):580-587

    Xu H, Huang X, Guo Z, Zhou H, Jin H, Huang X. Outcome of Surgical Repair and Rehabilitation of Flexor Tendon Injuries in Zone II of the Hand: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Feb 4. pii: S0363-5023(21)00755-3.

    Tang JB. Investigations into flexor tendon repair: a research journey over three decades. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2022 Jun;47(6):568-579

    Mallina R, Bamford E, Shelton I, Selby A, Russell P, Johnson N. A Review of Outcome Reporting Practices after Flexor Tendon Repair in Zones 1 and 2. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022 Apr;27(2):226-232.

    Suszynski TM, Coutinho D, Kaufmann RA. Flexor Tendon Repair in Zone II Augmented  With an Externalized Detensioning Suture: Protected Flexor Tendon Repair. J Hand  Surg Am. 2023 Mar 11. pii: S0363-5023(23)00041-2. 

  5. Guidelines

    none

  6. literature search

    Literature search on the pages of pubmed.