- Intraoperative complications arise from unintentional injury to anatomically adjacent structures.
- The frequency generally ranges from 2 to 12% in colon procedures.
Note: Known risk factors for intraoperative injury to adjacent structures include:
- Obesity
- Previous surgeries
- Adhesive abdomen
- Emergency procedure
- T4 tumor or extensive accompanying inflammation
1.) Bowel Injury:
- Frequency 1-3%, necessary adhesiolysis increases the risk to 4-13%
- Possible Injury Patterns:
- Superficial serosal injuries
- Transmural lesions of the bowel wall
- Thermal damage to the bowel wall using monopolar/bipolar scissors or ultrasonic dissector, especially in the area of the left flexure.
- Mesenteric tears with subsequent ischemia of the dependent bowel segment
- Injury from trocar placement or Veress needle
- Prevention:
- In recurrent procedures, incision as far as possible outside the scar
- Open insertion of the first trocar after previous surgeries via a mini-laparotomy
- Grasping the bowel as much as possible in the area of the taeniae or appendices epiploicae only with atraumatic grasping forceps under vision
- No blind coagulations, careful, targeted preparation with ultrasonic scissors/bipolar sealing instruments
Note: Ultrasonic scissors and bipolar sealing devices can cause thermal damage several seconds after active use.
- Procedure upon Recognition:
- Laparoscopic suturing for serosal lesions and smaller defects
- For larger defects >1/2 of the circumference or meso-near lesions: laparoscopic or possibly open resection and anastomosis
2.) Spleen Injury
- Injury Mechanism: Traction on the colon or greater omentum during mobilization of the left flexure typically results in inferior or medial superficial capsular lesions.
- Prevention: Mobilization of the left flexure with great care and under good setting of the situs. Omental adhesions to the splenic capsule should be released early.
- Procedure upon Recognition:
- Coagulation with bipolar current (bipolar forceps), possibly applying hemostatic agents (Tachosil, Flowseal, etc.) or fibrin glue.
- A spleen-preserving therapy should always be pursued, as it is associated with a lower complication rate than splenectomy.
Note: A laparotomy is only necessary in exceptional cases.
3.) Pancreas Injury
- Injury Mechanism: During mobilization of the left flexure and also during the care of the inferior mesenteric vein, preparation is close to the pancreatic tail and the lower edge of the pancreas, so that injury can occur in the course of this.
- Procedure upon Recognition:
- In case of bleeding, proceed similarly to spleen injuries. Coagulation with bipolar current (bipolar forceps) or laparoscopic suturing, possibly applying a hemostatic agent (Tachosil, Flowseal, etc.) or fibrin glue.
- For parenchymal injuries, it is recommended to place a drain to be able to drain secretions in case of a pancreatic fistula and to prevent postoperative behavior.
4.) Ureter Injury
- Injury Mechanism: During mobilization of the sigmoid, due to its close anatomical relationship, injury to the ureter can occur. In addition to sharp partial or complete transections, electrical injuries are also possible.
- Prevention:
- Preservation of the Gerota fascia
- Secure identification of the ureter
- Possibly use of ICG for better visualization
NOTE: Special caution is required in previous surgeries and inflammation- or tumor-related adhesions with disruption of anatomical layers in the pelvis. Preoperative stenting of the ureter should be considered to facilitate its identification.
- Intraoperative Diagnosis
- Visual examination
- Therapy
- Stenting and suturing for short-segment injuries
Note: For superficial injuries, laparoscopic suturing can be performed; otherwise, a small laparotomy is recommended in direct projection onto the injury site to suture the ureter under vision. In any case, the insertion of a ureteral stent is indicated.
- Extensive injuries or partial resections require complex urological reconstructions (diversion, contralateral implantation, psoas hitch procedure).
5.) Intraoperative Bleeding
- Risk Factors:
- Obesity
- Altered anatomy due to previous surgeries, inflammations, and tumors
- Emergency procedures
- Symptoms/Clinic: Depending on the size of the injured vessel and the associated blood loss, variable clinical manifestations from intraoperatively inconspicuous courses to acute shock symptoms (hemorrhagic shock) are possible.
- Diagnosis: Intraoperative visual identification of the bleeding source
- Prevention:
- Identification of surgical or patient-related risk factors for bleeding complications
- Use of ICG for identification of vascular structures
- Therapy
- Temporary bleeding control by compression with a laparoscopic atraumatic instrument
- Informing the surgical team and anesthesia
- Creating the best possible material and personnel situation surgically (vascular surgeon, second experienced surgeon) as well as anesthesiologically (senior physician, blood units, volume, etc.)
- Transfusion if transfusion criteria are met
- Surgical Tactics
- Bleeding from smaller vessels can usually be controlled using bipolar current or ultrasonic scissors and possibly by clipping.
- With appropriate expertise, small to medium vessels can also be sutured laparoscopically.
- For injuries to large vessels (e.g., aorta, vena cava), immediate laparotomy is indicated. Inform anesthesia and provide blood units, possibly involve a vascular surgeon and prepare a vascular tray, create anatomical overview, repair the vessel defect.
- Injury to muscular or epigastric vessels in the abdominal wall during trocar placement: Compression, possibly over a filled bladder catheter. U-sutures above and below the trocar insertion site. In case of doubt, enlarge the incision site and directly encircle, especially in obese abdominal walls.
NOTE: Uncontrolled use of the suction device, especially in venous injuries, can significantly but almost imperceptibly increase blood loss. Therefore, apply compression until ready and then use the suction device in a targeted manner to care for the injury.
6.) Intraoperative Leakage of the Anastomosis
- Prevention:
- Anastomosis creation tension-free and well-perfused (use of ICG)
- Extend the spike of the endoluminal stapler in the center of the linear staple line
- Diagnosis: Perform an intraoperative test of the anastomosis as a hydropneumatic leak test or as a test with diluted methylene blue solution.
- Therapy:
- If the leak test is conspicuous, suturing can be performed for small and easily accessible insufficiencies.
- In case of doubt, re-establish the anastomosis.
- Possibly consider creating a protective ileostomy in case of intraoperative leakage